KERORO剧场版5周年纪念，《超剧场版KERORO军曹 诞生！究极KERORO 奇迹的时空岛》即将启动！在KERORO最新剧场版中，将有阳光海滩、可爱的精灵，神秘的双胞胎和最凶邪灵登场，KERORO军曹将变身究极形态展开前所未有的超级大战。实力派歌手平原绫香也将为本作倾情献声。　　一日，冬树收到了一个和KERORO一模一样的石像，为了解开这个秘密，KERORO和冬树开始了前所未有的大冒险……

　　该片根据内村光良在2011年担当导演、原作、剧本、以及主演的舞台剧《出生在东京奥运的男人》进行改编，讲述了出生在1964年东京奥运年的主人公秋田泉一（内村光良饰），由于在年轻时获得过赛跑比赛冠军，令他产生渴望登上世界最高领奖台并为之奋斗的故事。秋田泉一无论在绘画还是书法等各个领域都囊获一等奖，但在中学时代去一蹶不振，尽受挫折。因此为契机，秋田泉一被上白石萌歌等主演的异性学生们玩弄。

　　

 影片以一对年轻人在大城市追寻梦想为切入点，以顾森和穆曦二人互相治愈的感情发展以及事业为主线，命运让两个年轻人撞到一起，顾森游走在心狠手辣的投资界，正遭到多年打拼的兄弟背叛，并拉拢身患病症的穆曦一同为奸，两人在经过情感背后的层层阴谋后，扒开背叛的外衣，最终共同追梦，携手人生，开启了一段互相治愈的爱之旅。

　　越战时期，奔赴战场的美国大兵途径香港时，会在湾仔停留，这让湾仔自1950年代末的数年间，充斥靠他们过日子的纹身师傅、小要饭、拿着照片找爸爸的“杂种”、阿飞及实为妓女的Bar女郎，形成特有的风情。　　Bar坊妈咪回乡找人做Bar女，家境贫寒、相貌不俗、个性倔强的赖水尾（夏文汐）和几个同乡姐妹从大澳渔村来到湾仔，开始卖肉生涯。起初，渔家女受到其他Bar女的嘲笑，但经过经验丰富的小伶玉（于倩）的一番调教，她们很快不输她人，易名水美丽的赖水尾更是出尽风头。风度翩翩却又年少轻狂的“杂种”Jimmy（黄秋生）幼年丧母，小伶玉将他养大后视作私有财产，不过Jimmy对她并无爱情，他心里只有不知身在何方的父亲。为Jimmy着迷的不止小伶玉一人，诸多Bar女只怪小伶玉将他看得太紧，他又不给她们揩油的机会。水美丽亦钟情于他。　　某次Jimmy被阿飞堵截，水美丽机智将他相救，又相告有心听来的他父亲的名字，两人瞒着小伶玉开始恋爱。后来水美丽为了他与小伶玉撕破脸，主动离开Bar坊，而找到父亲的他早忘记当初誓言，拍拍屁股去了美国。一家不要家家不要的行规令水美丽成为街头妓女，但小伶玉这个机会亦不给她，无奈之下她去了麻油地，几年挣扎，境况越来越糟。亏得性情相投的黑帮大姐大王英（叶德娴）相助，水美丽东山再起，短短几年更将生意做到了尖沙咀。　　随着越战的结束，湾仔渐成荒凉地，小伶玉亦变作风中残烛。水美丽念旧恩将她探望时，Jimmy恰好回港。听闻他是回港找妻，旁人都以为水美丽会与他再续前缘，对他早已死心的水美丽心底亦再泛涟漪，不料他早变作世俗之人，更将两人的感情忘得一干二净。其后水美丽有心将精力全部放在生意上，无奈时代风云不是她及待她若同性爱侣的王英所能把握。

　　Voice 1 (male "professional announcer" type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.　　These people also scorned "subjective profundity". They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.　　Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.　　Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.　　Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.　　The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.　　Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.　　The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole "” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.　　This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.　　The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...　　Voice 2: "Our life is a journey "” In the winter and the night. "” We seek our passage..."�　　Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.　　Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.　　On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.　　Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.　　Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.　　Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.　　Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment "ordinary life"� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.　　The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.　　What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.　　Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.　　Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.　　Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.　　Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.　　Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.　　Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.　　Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?　　Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.　　Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.　　Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.　　Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation "” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.　　Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.　　Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.　　The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.　　To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?　　Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.　　1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

　　此片是一出幽默感人的戏剧，主角是一位前卫的艺术家，也是一位好幻想的父亲，他的家人却对他毫无办法。　　这是大师卢凯蒂的半自传作品，它完美再现了1970年的时代面貌。该片由吉姆．罗斯．斯图尔特担任主演，他　　曾出演过电影《敲开我心门》。

　　2000年香港，女权运动不断高涨，为了对付妇解份子，“防止虐夫会”因而成立，在必要时以暴易暴，消灭妇解中的恐布份子。　　郑则士受到妻子虐待及迫害，甚至人身自由亦被剥夺，郑遂向“防止虐夫会”求助，可惜其畏妻症太深，最后被认为无药可救，自愿接受人道毁灭。　　其宝郑并未死，暗中观察其妻举动，知妻对他尚有深厚感情，于是接受“防止虐夫会”林主席建议，携手榴弹与妻展开谈判，若她仍不悔改，则同归于尽，怎料郑妻见夫归来，高兴之余，却意外炸死了林主席，而男女权斗争也随之结束。

　　“动乱时代”特指1598年俄罗斯统治家族绝嗣之後的一段长期动荡。由于正统王室後继无人，俄罗斯农民落入外国势力之下，瑞典、立陶宛、德国和波兰的占领者纷至沓来。1612年， 这时正值所谓的“动乱时代”的末期，勇敢的俄罗斯人把占据克里姆林宫几个月的波兰人赶了出去。1613年罗曼诺夫王朝的开始标志着这一时代的结束。

　　1911年4月，广州黄花岗起义失败，清政府开始大肆搜捕革命党人。海城作为广州通往内地的重要关卡，随着大批清廷密探的到来，也变得情势紧张起来。　　夏至上午，柳晚晴在海城医院得知自己怀孕。她欣喜地接通了丈夫谢志远的电话，可还没来得及说出这个喜讯，就被丈夫告知他要出差，然后匆匆挂了电话。　　当天午夜，两名警察匆匆敲开谢家的门，带来了谢志远遭遇车祸的噩耗。柳晚晴赶到医院，发现丈夫已经遇难身亡。更让她无法接受的是：与丈夫一同遭遇车祸的还有一位妙龄女子王心茹。从车上的行李和找到的两张船票来看，两个人显然是约好了私奔。在警察局，柳晚晴还遇到了为那个妙龄女子处理后事的男人，他叫萧枫，是王心茹的丈夫。　　萧枫告诉她：在整理遗物的过程中，发现了一把钥匙，沿着这个线索，他找到了谢志远和王心茹秘密幽会的旅馆。柳晚晴终于相信这个令人晴天霹雳的“事实”。也许是同命相怜，柳晚晴渐渐对正直温柔的萧枫产生了好感。　　可就在这个时候，柳晚晴发现了一件极其可疑的事情--萧枫向警察撒了谎，谢志远出车祸那天，萧枫并不是如他所说在家中养病，而是开车出了趟城。可他为什么要隐瞒呢？难道他和丈夫的死有什么牵连？　　怀着这些疑问，柳晚晴开始了自己的调查。她发现丈夫出事那辆汽车轮胎曾被子弹射穿，而萧枫抽屉里有一把手枪，弹夹中的子弹与射穿轮胎的子弹是同一型号。 萧枫向晚晴坦白：那次车祸不是意外。晚晴原谅了萧枫。　　隔日，柳晚晴身体不舒服，萧枫陪她去海城医院检查身体，在萧枫走后，柳晚晴顺便问了一下王心茹生前的情况。结果发现了一件更为可怕的事情：王心茹根本没有结过婚，更没有所谓的丈夫！　　柳晚晴开始悄悄跟踪萧枫，竟一路来到了谢志远和王心茹幽会过的旅馆。更让柳晚晴大吃一惊的是：那个在车祸中丧生的王心茹居然死而复生！萧枫和她约在旅馆见面，两个人似乎有着不可告人的秘密。　　萧枫和王心茹的真实身份究竟是谁？他们为什么要费尽心思接近柳晚晴？谢志远到底是生还是死？

　　夜里，陈父被铃木惠子枪杀。女儿陈美丽一觉醒来，发现已经是5年后，5年间的记忆居然全无。所有的信息都只能从阿亮口中得知。当陈美丽意外从口袋里发现一张写着“别相信他”的纸条时，开始怀疑阿亮。陈美丽假借拥抱阿亮取走了他的手枪，却在没注意之时，又被阿亮夺回手枪。急中生智的她选择跳窗而逃，最后却被阿亮逮于一所民宅。　　铃木惠子警告阿亮要再三小心。第二日，当失忆的陈美丽再次看到“别相信他”的纸条时，再次选择了逃跑，途中被万小白搭救。夜里，万小白的朋友孟飞对陈美丽实施催眠，助其找回记忆，并得知日本人的试验计划全在山田实验室。可惜到了第二天，陈美丽又失去了记忆，当她看到“别相信他”的纸条时，又对万小白产生了怀疑，遂逃跑，却碰见正在四处寻找陈美丽的阿亮。阿亮使用花言巧语迷惑陈美丽，又成功捕获万小白。当受到阿亮的蛊惑，陈美丽错手杀死万小白。后来，其实一直假装失忆的陈美丽将计就计，被送往山田实验室。　　陈美丽在众人睡觉之时搜查档案被发现，只有拿出枪械威胁山田交出档案，不料却阴差阳错放走了山田。陈美丽就要被杀的千钧一发之际，万小白赶来搭救。赶来的铃木惠子一枪解决了万小白，并给想立功的阿亮机会宰杀陈美丽，不想阿亮反过来打死了铃木惠子和山田杏子。原来，一切都是阿亮的计划。

　　大户人家的大少奶奶的陪嫁丫鬟上吊死了，夜半歌声吓坏一大宅子的人，还把大小姐给吓坏了，从此不言语，一日家里来了美术老师，彻查此案，发现疑点重重，嫌疑人一个接一个，但是都没能找出真凶...